Teaching Statistics for Bildung: What does it Mean -  and What

Undervisning i Statistik, Bildung, Folkeskolen

I de seneste årtier er data og statistik blevet mere og mere centrale i politiske beslutninger, arbejdsliv og hverdagsliv. Statistiske modeller og datadrevne systemer påvirker hvilken information vi får adgang til, hvordan beslutninger bliver begrundet og hvordan den offentlige debat udspiller sig. Samtidig er systemernes antagelser og datagrundlag ofte svære at gennemskue for ikke-specialister. Dette bliver til et relevansparadoks for skolen: På den ene side bliver statistik fremhævet som samfundsvigtig. På den anden side oplever eleverne undervisningen som procedurepræget og løsrevet fra spørgsmål, der betyder noget. Denne afhandling tager afsæt i dette paradoks og undersøger, hvordan statistikundervisning i den danske grundskole kan bidrage til elevers dannelse.

Dannelse forstås i denne afhandling som en orientering mod udvikling af dømmekraft, selvvirksomhed og deltagelse i verden. Begrebet er forankret i den tysk-skandinaviske didaktik tradition og bruges her som en regulativ idé – ikke som et afgrænset eller målbart læringsudbytte. Afhandlingen forsøger derfor ikke at “påvise” dannelse som et observerbart resultat. Den undersøger i stedet, hvordan dannelsesorienterede intentioner kan fortolkes, omsættes og gøres meningsfulde i konkrete undervisningspraksisser i statistik. Begreber som statistical literacy, critical statistical literacy og civic statistics forstås i den sammenhæng som domænespecifikke udtryk for normative idealer om dømmekraft, autonomi og deltagelse.

Afhandlingens overordnede forskningsspørgsmål er: Hvordan kan statistikundervisning i dansk udskoling bidrage til elevers dannelse? Spørgsmålet udfoldes i to underspørgsmål om (a) hvordan elevers arbejde med virkelighedsnære data kan understøtte selvvirksomhed og personlig dømmekraft i statistiske situationer, og (b) hvordan dette arbejde kan styrke elevers muligheder for myndig deltagelse i sådanne situationer.

Metodisk er afhandlingen forankret i design-based research og gennemført i samarbejde med en erfaren matematiklærer. Datagrundlaget stammer fra tre sammenhængende undervisningsmoduler, som blev afprøvet over et skoleår i en almindelig dansk 6. klasse. Eleverne arbejdede med data fra både personlige og samfundsmæssige sammenhænge, herunder familierelaterede data, undersøgelser i klassen og statistiske undersøgelser i medierne. Digitale statistikværktøjer understøttede elevernes udforskning, repræsentation og fortolkning af data. Ph.d.-projektet kombinerer undervisningseksperimenter, analyser af klassesamtaler, elevprodukter og processer for at undersøge, hvordan undervisningsdesign former elevers engagement i statistik.

Et centralt teoretisk og empirisk fokus er den statistiske idé om fordeling, som afhandlingen behandler som eksemplarisk indhold i en dannelsesorienteret statistikundervisning. Fordeling forstås ikke kun som et emne i statistik, men som en måde at se verden på: Man får øje på variation, mønstre og sammenhænge – og på, data som en helhed i stedet for et sæt af individuelle værdier. Arbejdet med fordeling inviterer eleverne til at bevæge sig fra anekdotisk tænkning til at se og forstå problemstillinger gennem beskrivelser af meningsfulde strukturer i data. Afhandlingen analyserer dette perspektivskifte som en vigtig forudsætning for udvikling af statistisk dømmekraft i både personlige og samfundsmæssige sammenhænge.

Analyserne viser, hvordan elevers forståelse af fordeling udvikler sig i samspil med dynamiske digitale værktøjer. Værktøjerne gør det muligt at omorganisere data, afprøve forskellige repræsentationer og undersøge, hvad der sker, når man ændrer måden data struktureres og sammenfattes på. På den måde understøtter værktøjerne en bevægelse mellem uformel meningsdannelse og mere formelle statistiske beskrivelser. Samtidig påvirker de, hvilke muligheder der opstår for refleksion og dømmekraft i undervisningen.

Afhandlingen viser også, at dannelsesorienteret engagement i statistik ikke kan forstås alene som individuel begrebsudvikling. Det hænger tæt sammen med klassens sociale praksis. Analyser af klassesamtaler viser, hvordan sociomatematiske normer gradvist etableres og former, hvad der tæller som en god statistisk beskrivelse, en rimelig fortolkning og et legitimt argument. Normerne understøtter, at eleverne bevæger sig ud over procedurebaserede svar og i højere grad begrunder og sammenligner statistiske beskrivelser i relation til virkelige fænomener.

Et gennemgående resultat er betydningen af en balance mellem modtagelighed og selvvirksomhed. Modtagelighed styrkes, når undervisningen åbner for variation og flere fortolkningsmuligheder. Selvvirksomhed styrkes, når eleverne får rum til at formulere egne perspektiver, knytte statistiske resultater til erfaringer og deltage i fælles fortolkning. Afhandlingen viser, hvordan denne balance kan understøttes gennem valg af data, brug af digitale værktøjer og læreres orkestrering af klassedialog.

Afhandlingen bidrager til statistikdidaktisk forskning ved at udvikle en teoretisk forankret og empirisk informeret analyse af statistikundervisningens dannelsesbidrag. Den videreudvikler forståelsen af fordeling som eksemplarisk indhold, tydeliggør digitale værktøjers medierende rolle i elevers dømmekraft og selvvirksomhed og viser, hvordan sociomatematiske normer kan støtte en dannelsesorienteret tilgang. Metodisk bidrager studiet til diskussioner om empirisk dannelsesforskning ved at vise, hvordan dannelse kan undersøges gennem analyser af undervisningspraksis. Afhandlingen afsluttes med en syntese af reviderede designprincipper, der sigter mod at styrke elevers dømmekraft, selvvirksomhed og myndige deltagelse i et datarigt samfund.

Ahl, L. M., & Helenius, O. (2022). New demands on the symbols and formalism competency in the digital era. In U. T. Jankvist & E. Geraniou (Eds.), Mathematical competencies in the digital era (pp. 159–176). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10141-0_9

Bakker, A. (2018). Design research in education: A practical guide for early career researchers (1st ed.). Routledge, an imprint of Taylor and Francis.

Bakker, A., & Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2004). Learning to reason about distribution. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 147–168). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_7

Bakker, A., & Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2005). Diagrammatic reasoning as the basis for developing concepts: A semiotic analysis of students’ learning about statistical distribution. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60(3), 333–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-5536-8

Bakker, A., & van Eerde, D. (2015). An introduction to design-based research with an example from statistics education. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education: Advances in mathematics education (pp. 429–466). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_16

Barbin, E. (1997). Histoire des mathématiques: Pourquoi? Comment? [History of mathematics: Why? How?]. Bulletin AMQ, 37(1), 20–25.

Bargagliotti, A., Franklin, C., Arnold, P., Gould, R., Johnson, S., Perez, L., & Spangler, D. A. (2020). Pre-K-12 guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education II (GAISE II): A framework for statistics and data science education. https://www.amstat.org/asa/education/Guidelines-for-Assessment-and-Instruction-in-Statistics-Education-Reports.aspx

Bauer, L. (1990). Mathematikunterrich und Reflexion [Mathematics teaching and reflection]. Mathematik Lehren, 38, 6-9.

Ben-Zvi, D., & Ben-Arush, T. (2014). EDA Instrumented learning with TinkerPlots. In T. Wassong, D. Frischemeier, P. R. Fischer, R. Hochmuth, & P. Bender (Eds.), Mit Werkzeugen Mathematik und Stochastik lernen – Using tools for learning mathematics and statistics (pp. 193–208). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03104-6_15

Ben-Zvi, D., & Garfield, J. (2004). Statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking: Goals, definitions, and challenges. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 3–15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_1

Ben-Zvi, D., Gravemeijer, K., & Ainley, J. (2018). Design of statistics learning environments. In D. Ben-Zvi, K. Makar, & J. Garfield (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (pp. 473–502). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66195-7

Biehler, R. (2019). Allgemeinbildung, mathematical literacy, and competence orientation. In H. N. Jahnke & L. Hefendehl-Hebeker (Eds.), Traditions in German-speaking mathematics education research (pp. 141–170). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11069-7_6

Biehler, R., Ben-Zvi, D., Bakker, A., & Makar, K. (2013). Technology for enhancing statistical reasoning at the school level. In M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 643–689). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_21

Biehler, R., Frischemeier, D., Reading, C., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2018). Reasoning about data. In D. Ben-Zvi, K. Makar, & J. Garfield (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (pp. 139–192). Springer.

Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9

Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Prediger, S. (2010). Networking of theories—An approach for exploiting the diversity of theoretical approaches. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers (pp. 483–506). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00742-2_46

Blomhøj, M. (2001). Hvorfor matematikundervisning?: matematik og almendannelse i et højteknologisk samfund (Why mathematics education? Mathematics and Allgemeinbildung in a high-tech society). Centre for Research in Learning Mathematics, 24.

Broström, S. (2022). Didaktik og/eller læreplan. Dansk Pædagogisk Tidsskrift, 2022(2), 7–21.

Burrill, G., & Biehler, R. (2011). Fundamental statistical ideas in the school curriculum and in training teachers. In C. Batanaro, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics: Challenges for teaching and teacher education (pp. 57–69). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0_10

Büscher, C. (2018). Mathematical literacy on statistical measures: A design research study (1st ed.; Vol. 37). Springer Vieweg. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23069-2

Büscher, C. (2022). Design principles for developing statistical literacy in middle schools. Statistics Education Research Journal, 21(1), 1–16.

Büscher, C. (2024). Adapting Habermas’ construct of communicative rationality into a framework for analyzing students’ statistical literacy. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 117(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10325-5

Callingham, R., & Watson, J. (2017). The development of statistical literacy at school. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(1), 181–201. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.52041/serj.v16i1.223

Caspersen, S. (2021, April 3). I det rigeste lokalområde tjener de fem gange mere end bunden [In the wealthiest local area, incomes are five times higher than at the bottom]. https://www.ae.dk/analyse/2021-04-i-det-rigeste-lokalomraade-tjener-de-fem-gange-mere-end-bunden

Cobb, G. W. (1992). Teaching statistics. In L. Steen (Ed.), Heeding the call for change: Suggestions for curricular action (pp. 3–43). Mathematical Association of America.

Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical development: The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 5–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0101_1

Cobb, P. (2007). Putting philosophy to work: Coping with multiple theoretical perspectives. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the national council of teachers of mathematics (pp. 3–38). NCTM. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-28141-200-320251003

Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009

Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K. P. E., Bowers, J., & Doorman, L. M. (1997). Statistical minitools [applets and applications]. Vanderbilt University, Freudenthal Institute, & Utrecht University.

Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K. P. E., Bowers, J., & Doorrnan, L. M. (1997). Statistical Minitools [applets and applications]. anderbilt University, Freudenthal Institute, & Utrecht University.

Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2004). Principles of instructional design for supporting the development of students’ statistical reasoning. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 375–395). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_16

Cobb, P. & Steffe, L. (1983). The constructivist researcher as teacher and model builder. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9729-3_3

Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31(3–4), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1996.9653265

Cockcroft, W. (1982). Mathematics counts: Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the teaching of mathematics in schools. HMSO. http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/cockcroft/

Douardy, R. (1991). Tool, object, setting, window: Elements for analysing and constructing didactical situations in mathematics. In A. J. Bishop, S. Mellin-Olsen, & J. van Dormolen (Eds.), Mathematical Knowledge: Its Growth Through Teaching (pp. 109–130). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Drijvers, P., Godino, J. D., Font, V., & Trouche, L. (2013). One episode, two lenses. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9416-8

Dubinsky, E. (1991). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking (pp. 95–123). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Elkjær, M., & Hodgen, J. (2022). Operationalising Vergnaud’s notion of scheme in task design in online learning environments to support the implementation of formative assessment. Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/26670127-bja10002

Engel, J. (2017). Statistical literacy for active citizenship: A call for data science education. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v16i1.213

Engel, J., Nicholson, J., & Louie, J. (2022). Preparing for a Data-Rich World: Civic Statistics Across the Curriculum. In J. Ridgway (Ed.), Statistics for empowerment and social engagement: Teaching civic statistics to develop informed citizens (pp. 445–475). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20748-8_18

Engel, J., & Ridgway, J. (2022). Back to the future: Rethinking the purpose and nature of statistics education. In J. Ridgway (Ed.), Statistics for empowerment and social engagement: Teaching civic statistics to develop informed citizens (pp. 17–36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20748-8_2

Fienberg, S. E. (1992). A brief history of statistics in three and one-half chapters: A review essay. Statistical Science, 7(2), 208–225. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011360

Finzer, B., & Damelin, D. (2014). Common online data analysis platform. The Concord Consortium.

Finzer, W. (2001). Fathom Dynamic Statistics (vl.0). Key Curriculum Press.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363

Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., & Schaeffer, R. (2007). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report: A pre-K-12 curriculum framework. American Statistical Association.

Færch, J., Ahl, L., & Jankvist, U. (2022, 7–9 September 2022). Utilizing the notion of scheme in task design for an online assignment portal. MEDA3 Mathematics Education in Digital Age 3. 13th ERME Topic Conference (ETC13), Nitra, Slovakia. https://hal.science/hal-03925304.

Gal, I. (2002). Adults’ statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique, 70(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/1403713

Gal, I. (2004). Statistical literacy: meanings, components, responsibilities. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 47–78). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Gal, I. (2021). Promoting statistical literacy: Challenges and reflections with a Brazilian perspective. In C. Monterio & L. Carvalho (Eds.), Temas emergentes em letramento estatistico [Emerging themes in statistical literacy] (pp. 37–59). UFPE Press.

Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2004). Research on statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking: Issues, challenges, and implications. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 397–409). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Forgasz, H. (2015). A rich interpretation of numeracy for the 21st century: A survey of the state of the field. ZDM, 47(4), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0708-1

Geiger, V., Yasukawa, K., Bennison, A., Wells, J. F., & Sawatzki, C. (2020). Facets of numeracy: Teaching, learning and practices. In J. Way, C. Attard, J. Anderson, J. Bobis, H. McMaster, & K. Cartwright (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2016–2019 (pp. 59–89). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4269-5_4

Gigerenzer, G. (2022). Democracy needs statistical literacy. In J. Ridgway (Ed.), Statistics for empowerment and social engagement: Teaching civic statistics to develop informed citizens (pp. v–vii). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20748-8

Graf, S. T. (2021). Outline of a taxonomy for general Bildung: Deep learning in the anglophone tradition of curiiculum studies and the Didaktik of north-west Europe. In E. Krogh, A. Qvorttrup, & S. T. Graf (Eds.), Didaktik and curriculum in ongoing dialogue (pp. 83–102). Routledge.

Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F.-L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 1051–1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6

Gravemeijer, K. P. E., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In J. Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design Research (pp. 45–85). Taylor and Francis.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1809/2006). Nürnberger Gymnasialkurse und Gymnasialreden (1808-1816) [Nürnberg gymnasial courses and speeches] (Vol. 10). Felix Meiner Verlag.

Herman, S. (2025). Kampen om dannelsen i folkeskolen [The battle over Bildung in the Folkeskole]. EMU.dk. https://www.emu.dk/grundskole/paedagogik-og-didaktik/dannelse-i-skolen/kampen-om-dannelsen-i-folkeskolen

Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (2000). Starting a dialogue: A beginning conversation between Didaktik and the curriculum traditions. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German didaktik tradition (pp. 3–11). Routledge.

Horlacher, R. (2016). The educated subject and the German concept of Bildung: A comparative cultural history. Routledge.

Humboldt, W. v. (1793/1960). Theorie der Bildung des Menschen [Theory of human Bildung]. In A. Flitner & K. Giel (Eds.), Wilhelm von Humboldt. Schriften zur Anthropologie und Geschichte. Werke in Fünf Banden 1. (pp. 234–240). Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

Humboldt, W. v. (1809/1964). Werke: Schriften zur Politik und zum Bildungswesen [Works: Writings on politics and education] (Vol. 4). Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

Jahnke, H. N. (1991). Mathematik und Bildung in der Humboldtschen Reform. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik: Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Mathematik (GDM), 12(1), 93–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03338758

Jahnke, H. N. (2019). Mathematics and Bildung 1810 to 1850. In H. N. Jahnke & L. Hefendehl-Hebeker (Eds.), Traditions in German-speaking mathematics education research (pp. 115–140). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11069-7_5

Jahnke, H. N., Arcavi, A., Barbin, E., Bekken, O., Furinghetti, F., El Idrissi, A., da Silva, C. M. S., & Weeks, C. (2000). The use of original sources in the mathematics classroom. In J. Fauvel & J. Van Maanen (Eds.), History in mathematics education: The ICMI Study (pp. 291–328). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47220-1_9

Jensen, K. K., Andersen, M. M., Whiteley, L., & Sandøe, P. (Eds.). (2020). RCR: A Danish textbook for courses in responsible conduct of research (4th ed.). Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen.

Johansen, M. B. (2019). Litteratur og dannelse: At lade sig berige af noget andet end sig selv [Literature and Bildung: Allowing yourself to be enriched by something other than yourself]. Akademisk Forlag.

Johansen, S. G. (2023). Allgemeinbildung and digital technologies in mathematics education: A review. Nordic Studies in Matematics Education, 28(3–4), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v28i3-4.149031

Johansen, S. G. (2024). Students’ tool-shaped conceptualisation of the idea of statistical distributions: The case of Frida. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 10(2), 159–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-024-00138-9

Johansen, S. G., & Jankvist, U. T. (2022). The potential role of digital tools in students’ development of Bildung: An illustrative case of statistical distributions. In H.-G. Weigand, A. Donevska-Todorova, E. Faggiano, P. Iannone, & J. Medová (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th ERME Topic Conference (ETC13). MEDA3 Mathematics Education in Digital Age 3 (pp. 188–195). Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra. https://hal.science/hal-03925304

Johansen, S. G., & Jankvist, U. T. (2023). Making sense of distribution: A case of dépaysement. In P. Drijvers, C. Csapodi, H. Palmér, K. Gosztonyi, & E. Kónya (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME13) (pp. 948–955). Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics & ERME.

Johansen, S. G., & Skott, C. K. (manuscript under review). Establishing sociomathematical norms in statistics teaching in lower secondary classrooms.

Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., Mooney, E. S., & Thornton, C. A. (2004). Models of development in statistical reasoning. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 97–118). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Klafki, W. (1991). Neue Studien zur Bildungstheorie und Didaktik: Zeitgemässe Allgemeinbildung und kritisch-konstruktive Didaktik [New studies in Bildung theory and didactics: Contemporary Allgemeinbildung and critical-constructive didactic]. Beltz.

Klafki, W. (2000). The significance of classical theories of Bildung for a contemporary concept of Allgemeinbildung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice (pp. 85–107). Routledge.

Klafki, W. (2011). Dannelsesteori og didaktik: nye studier (B. Christensen, Trans.; 3. udgave ed.). Klim.

Konold, C., Higgins, T., Russell, S. J., & Khalil, K. (2015). Data seen through different lenses. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9529-8

Konold, C., & Miller, C. (2011). TinkerPlots (Version v2.0) [computer software]. Key Curriculum Press.

Konold, C., & Pollatsek, A. (2002). Data analysis as the search for signals in noisy processes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(4), 259–289. https://doi.org/10.2307/749741

Korsgaard, O., Kristensen, J. E., & Jensen, H. S. (2017). Pædagogikkens idehistorie. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interview: det kvalitative forskningsinterview som håndværk [Interview: the qualitative research interview as craft] (3. udg.). Hans Reitzel.

Larsen, S. N. (2017). Dannelsesteori. In P. Ø. Andersen & T. Ellegaard (Eds.), Klassisk og moderne pædagogisk teori (pp. 825–830). Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Lyall, T. W. (2017). Merete Riisager og dannelsen. Altinget. https://www.altinget.dk/uddannelse/artikel/merete-riisager-og-dannelsen

Løvlie, L. (2003). Teknokulturell danning. In L. Løvlie, R. Slagstad, O. Korsgaard, & O. Korsgaard (Eds.), Dannelsens forvandlinger (pp. 347–371). Pax Forlag.

Løvlie, L., & Standish, P. (2002). Introduction: Bildung and the idea of a liberal education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36, 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00279

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2019). Conducting educational design research (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Michelsen, C. (2016). Den matematiske og naturvidenskabelige dannelse [Mathematical and scientifuc Bildung]. In A. v. Oettingen (Ed.), Almen dannelse – Dannelsesstandarder og fag. Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Ministry of Children and Education. (2024). Ekspertgruppe for Fagfornyelsen: Beslutningsgrundlag [Expert group for the curriculum renewal: Basis for decision-making]. Børne- og Undervisningsminsteriet. https://uvm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2024/december/241218-fagfornyelsens-beslutningsgrundlag/

Ministry of Children and Education. (2019). Common Objectives (Fælles Mål) Mathematics. https://www.emu.dk/grundskole/matematik/faghaefte-faelles-maal-laeseplan-og-vejledning?b=t5-t9

Misfeldt, M. (Chair). (2025, August 27). Allgemeinbildung as a perspective on STEM education [Symposium]. The 16th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA 2025), Copenhagen, Demark. https://virtual.oxfordabstracts.com/event/73500/program?session=168874&date=%222025-8-27%22

Mokros, J., & Russell, S. J. (1995). Children’s concepts of average and representativeness. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/749226

Moore, D. S. (1990). Uncertainty. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), On the shoulders of giants: New approaches to numeracy (pp. 95–138). National Academy Press.

Moore, D. S. (1997). New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics. International Statistical Review, 65(2), 123–165.

Mortensen, K. P. (1998). Dannelse på dansk. In I. Dalsgaard, M. Hansen, & G. Ingerslev (Eds.), Midt i ræset: En artikelsamling om dansk (pp. 37–70). Dansklærerforeningen.

Nabe-Nielsen, B. (2022). Alle taler om dannelse. Men hvad betyder det egentlig? [Everybody talks about Bildung but what doet it mean?]. Kristeligt Dagblad. https://www.kristeligt-dagblad.dk/debat/alle-taler-om-dannelse-men-hvad-betyder-det-egentlig

Neubrand, M. (2000). Reflecing as a Didaktik construction: Speaking about mathematics in the mathematics classroom. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a Reflective Practice (pp. 251–266). Lawrence Erlbaum Association.

Neubrand, M. (2015). Bildungstheoretische Grundlagen des Mathematikunterrichts [Bildung-theoretical foundations of mathematics teaching]. In R. Bruder, L. Hefendehl-Hebeker, B. Schmidt-Thieme, & H.-G. Weigand (Eds.), Handbuch der Mathematikdidaktik (pp. 51–73). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35119-8_3

Neupert, S. (2021, April 6). Danskernes indtægt opgjort for hvert sogn - det tjener de rigeste og de fattigste [Danes’ income calculated for each parish - this is what the richest and the poorest earn]. nyheder.tv2.dk. https://nyheder.tv2.dk/business/2021-04-06-danskernes-indtaegt-opgjort-for-hvert-sogn-det-tjener-de-rigeste-og-de-fattigste

Niss, M. (1990). Matematiske modeller, almendannelse og demokrati [Mathematical models, Allgemeinbildung and democracy]. Matematikundervisning og demokrati, Issue. I. Roskilde Universitetscenter.

Niss, M. (1994). Mathematics in society. In R. Biehler, R. W. Scholz, R. Sträßer, & B. Winkelmann (Eds.), Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (Vol. 13, pp. 367–378). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Niss, M. (2000). Gymnasiets opgave, almen dannelse og kompetencer [The task of upper secondary school, Allgemeinbildung and competencies]. Uddannelse: Undervisningsministeriets Tidsskrift, 33(2), 23–33.

Niss, M. (2021). Matematisk dannelse i det 21. århundrede [Mathematical Bildung in the 21st century]. In P. Weng, M. Wahl Andersen, & L. Østerlind (Eds.), Håndbog om matematik i grundskolen: Læring, undervisning og vejledning (2nd ed.; pp. 71–85). Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.

Niss, M., & Jablonka, E. (2020). Mathematical literacy. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 548–553). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_100

Noss, R. (1998). New numeracies for a technological culture. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(2), 2–12.

Petersen, B. S. (2009). Gymnasiefysikfagets almendannelsesbidrag: En undersøgelse af og bud på optimering af gymnasiefysikfagets fagfaglige og metafaglige bidrag til almendannelse [The contribution of upper secondary physics to Allgemeinbildung: An investigation of, and proposal for strengthening, the subject-specific and meta-subject contributions of upper secondary physics to general education] [Doctoral dissertation, Roskilde University].

Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 405–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.002

Prediger, S. (2005). Developing reflectiveness in mathematics classroom: An aim to be reached in several ways. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 37(3), 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-005-0017-1

Prediger, S. (2019). Theorizing in design research. Avances de Investigación en Educación Matemática, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem.v0i15.265

Ridgway, J. (Ed.). (2022). Statistics for empowerment and social engagement: Teaching civic statistics to develop informed citizens. Springer.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2007). Method. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 69–107). Information Age Publishing.

Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302715

Sharma, S. (2017). Definitions and models of statistical literacy: A literature review. Open Review of Educational Research, 4(1), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2017.1354313

Shaughnessy, M. J. (2007). Research on statistics learning and reasoning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 957–1009). Information Age Pub.

Silver, E. A., & Herbst, P. (2007). Theory in mathematics education scholarship. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 39–67). Information Age Publishing & NCTM.

Skott, J. (2008). Introduktion til Paul Cobbs matematikdidaktiske arbejde [Introduction to Paul Cobb’s work in mathematics education]. MONA, 2008(42–58).

Skovsmose, O. (1992). Democratic competence and reflective knowing in mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 12(2), 2–11.

Skovsmose, O. (1998). Linking mathematics education and democracy: Citizenship, mathematical archaeology, mathemacy and deliberative interaction. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 30(6), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-998-0010-6

Skovsmose, O. (2023). Critical mathematics education (1st ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26242-5

Skovsmose, O., & Nielsen, L. (1996). Critical mathematics education. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. W. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (Vol. 4; pp. 1257–1288). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0_36

Skovsmose, O., & Penteado, M. G. (2022). Landscapes of investigation: Contributions to critical mathematics education (Vol. 1). Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0316

Steen, L. (1999). Numeracy: The new literacy for a data-drenched society. Educational Leadership, 57, 8–13.

Straesser, R. (2015). “Numeracy at work”: A discussion of terms and results from empirical studies. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 47(4), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0689-0

Thomas, G. (2011). A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(6), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411409884

Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.

Ulriksen, L. (2023). Naturvidenskabens bidrag til almendannelsen [The contribution of science to Allgemeinbildung]. MONA - Matematik- og Naturfagsdidaktik, 23(3), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.7146/mona.v23i3.139986

Van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. v. Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 1-14). Kluwer.

Vergnaud, G. (1998). A comprehensive theory of representation for mathematics education. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80057-3

Vergnaud, G. (2009). The theory of conceptual fields. Human Development, 52(2), 83–94. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26764894

Vohns, A. (2017). Bildung, mathematical literacy and civic education: The (strange?) case of contemporary Austria and Germany. In A. Chronaki (Ed.), Mathematics education and life at times of crisis. Proceedings of the Ninth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (Vol. 2; pp. 968–978). University of Thessaly Press.

Vohns, A. (2018). Mathematische Bildung am Ausgang ihrer Epoche? Eine nicht bloß rhetorisch gemeinte Frage [Mathematical Bildung at the end of its epoch? A question not meant merely rhetorically]. Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Mathematik, 105, 8–21.

Vollmer, H. J. (2021). Bildung as the central category of education? Didactics, subject didactics, and general subject didactics in Germany. In E. Krogh, A. Qvorttrup, & S. T. Graf (Eds.), Didaktik and curriculum in ongoing dialogue (pp. 137–163). Routledge.

von Hentig, H. ( 1996). Bildung. Carl Hanser Verlag.

von Oettingen, A. (2016a). Almen dannelse og fag [Algemeine Bildung and school subjects]. In A. v. Oettingen (Ed.), Almen dannelse: dannelsesstandarder og fag (pp. 11–36). Hans Reitzels Forlag.

von Oettingen, A. (2016b). Almen didaktik: Mellem normativitet og evidens [Didactics: Between normativity and evidence]. Hans Reitzels Forlag.

von Oettingen, A. (2018). Pædagogisk forskning mellem teori, empiri og praksis - Bidrag til en empirisk dannelsesforskning [Pedagogical research between theoretical, empirical and practical knowledge]. In A. von Oettingen (Ed.), Empirisk dannelsesforskning: Mellem teori, empiri og praksis [Empirical research of Bildung: Between theoretical, empirical and practical knowledge] (pp. 19-68). Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wagenschein, M. (2000). Teaching to understand: On the concept of the exemplary in teaching. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Requarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 161–175). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Watson, J., & Callingham, R. (2003). Statistical literacy: A complex hierarchical construct. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(2), 3–46.

Weiland, T. (2017). Problematizing statistical literacy: An intersection of critical and statistical literacies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9764-5

Wiberg, M. (2018). Den teoretiske pædagogiks bidrag til empirisk forskning i dannelse - Kan man forske i dannelse? [The contribution of theoretical pedagogy to empirical research in Bildung - Can one research Bildung?]. In A. von Oettingen (Ed.), Empirisk dannelsesforskning: Mellem teori, empiri og praksis [Empirical research of Bildung: Between theoretical, empirical and practical knowledge] (pp. 69–92). Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Wiberg, M. (2021). Bildung - Vom Konzept zum Phänomen [Bildung – from concept to phenomenon] (D. Kergel, Trans.). In D. Kergel, Heidkamp-Kergel, & S.-N. August (Eds.), Handbuch interdisziplinäre Bildungsforschung (pp. 66–77). Beltz Juventa.

Wiberg, M. (2024). Dannelse gennem refleksion og selvvirksomhed [Bildung through reflexion and self-activity]. In E. Jensen, J. Aagård, & O. Løw (Eds.), Om dannelse i skole og læreruddannelse: En tværfaglig studiebog (1. udgave. ed.). Akademisk Forlag.

Wiberg, M. (2025). Begrebernes fest og håbet. Aarhus University. https://dpu.au.dk/fileadmin/edu/Praesentationer/Taler/DPU_25_aars_jubilaeum/Merete_Wiberg_tale.pdf

Wild, C. (2006). The concept of distribution. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v5i2.497

Wild, C. J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.1999.tb00442.x

Wild, C. J., Utts, J. M., & Horton, N. J. (2018). What is statistics?. In D. Ben-Zvi, K. Makar, & J. Garfield (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (pp. 53–56). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66195-7_1

Winter, H. (1990). Bürger und mathematik [Citizen and mathematics]. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 22(4), 131-146.

Winter, H. (1995). Mathematikunterricht und Allgemeinbildung [Mathematics education and Allgemeinbildung]. Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Mathematik, 61, 37-46.

Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education JRME, 27(4), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.27.4.0458

Zieffler, A., Garfield, J., & Fry, E. (2018). What is statistics education?. In D. Ben-Zvi, K. Makar, & J. Garfield (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (pp. 37–70). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66195-7_2